It amazes me sometimes how much some of these children reveal about themselves without intending or realizing it. Here is last night's homework question:
Judges in the Kingsborough Student Essay Contest disqualified Sam's entry because it broke one of the contest rules. The rules specified that students should place their name ONLY on the cover page of the essay, which the judges would not see, to make sure they judged it fairly and without bias against the individual student. Sam, however, put his name on each and every page of his essay. Nevertheless, Sam's entry should be allowed to qualify, because Sam's parents recently got divorced, and it's been very hard for him.
Which one of the following explains why this is a flawed response to the judges' decision?
A. It presents a conclusion without providing supporting evidence.
B. It treats a factor that may cause a particular outcome as the only possible cause of that outcome.
C. It focuses on a trivial, unimportant aspect of the judges' argument.
D. It incorrectly states the facts that formed the basis of the judges' decision.
E. It appeals to the judges' emotions instead of addressing their reason for disqualifying the essay.
Here is one student's answer, technical errors included:
Choice "A" is correct because first the explanation only says that Sam's parents were divorced as the only reason he did disobey the rule, however it doesn't say other resons such as Sam's age if he was a little boy or young student he may have emotional reasons why he did such a thing. He probably feels he didnt want to lose his name after losing a parent, and doesnt wanna except the change, and doesnt want to. No one can judge nor tell him what to do with his name.
Need I say more?